Chambers Jr Richard C

Attorney Chambers represented me in a highly acrimonious “nasty custody case.” I had met with a number of other lawyers and everyone of them quoted me exorbitant amounts and said I had no chances of winning. Richard took my case and the money was not his first priority. He fought hard for me and after a long nasty trial I received custody of my two minor daughters! Richard is an awesome lawyer we won and I will always highly recommend him!

Attn.Chambers helped my family with a probate matter recently and was nothing but Proffessional,Courteous,Fair (in price) and actual. We always felt like he had our best interests in mind. Filled us in at every court date prior, during and post. We definitely would hire him again, and have sent friends and family his way since. Thank you from us all Attn. Chambers. Keep up the good fight.

Richard is an extremely experienced lawyer. He won my case with ease and was always available throughout the time. He is very straightforward and knowledgeable. He’s the type of guy who will answer your call any time of the day and look out for you in all aspects. Highly recommend!

Mr. Chambers showed me the utmost concern from my first contact with him. I have had several legal matters throughout the passed 30 yrs and, as a career paralegal, I have known many lawyers with as many differing specialties. I've found too many to be narrow minded and not willing to help solve peripheral issues which began with the initial case. Too many attorneys want to behave as if they are "brokers," these days. Where are all the good lawyers from the old days? Lawyers who'll fight the good fight? I had begun to feel like I had to give up until I was referred to Richard. From our 1st discussion, I was made to feel comfortable, that he was paying close attention to the details which were bothering me and, although he would have to examine documents more closely, he spoke to my concerns and I was much better informed. I felt like this was a lawyer who cared and wanted to help me get satisfaction.
Richard Chambers, Jr. showed me what I had been hoping for but couldn't find: a REAL LAWYER - he is a man who is energized by and enjoys fighting to get the best possible results at every juncture. He has never let me down, has kept me aware of new details and, in every case he has handled for me, I have always come away feeling like a winner. Those were just business deals where I felt I had been mistreated and Richard always got me satisfaction. Where I was most impressed was when watching him argue my case in the courtroom. He is robust, ready to go, thinks quickly on his feet and carries himself in a way that you feel he has a Presence. Not only did he protect me at every turn - but I got the distinct feeling that not only did other lawyers look lazy by comparison but it felt like my adversaries' lawyers knew, including DAs, that they couldn't compare, were hesitant, not prepared to go up against him. Richard is either a legend or ahead of his time. You could not be in better hands in the conference or the court room. My friends have, all, come back to thank me for advising them to hire Mr.
Chambers.

I was reading the critical review by Bert about Richard Chambers not getting an affidavit from his plea lawyer to help get his old conviction overturned. Knowing the details, Bert is saying that Chambers did a bad job in not getting his former lawyer's affidavit, in which the former lawyer, supposedly, would have said that he had screwed up in his representation of Bert. Unfortunately, Bert doesn't know what he is talking about. I've been doing law work for over 50 years and I would find it extraordinary if a lawyer would write out an affidavit, or testify, that he had been incompetent in representing a client. If he did, he would open himself up to a law suit and legal problems with the bar licensing entities. I'm sure Bert's plea lawyer would never have given any such affidavit because it was against his best interests to do so. In fact, he probably would have given an opposite affidavit stating that he had followed all the rules and procedures! He would have buried Bert's claim! I've seen this same thing happen scores of times through the years. No lawyer that I know of has ever submitted an affidavit from a plea lawyer stating that he had screwed up--unless, of course, the client already had an affidavit from the lawyer stating that he had screwed up. This would only occur if the plea lawyer is no longer practicing law and doesn't care about disciplinary problems. So, if Chambers just went to the former plea lawyer and asked him cold, without knowing what his answer would be, if he had screwed up and the lawyer told him that he had not and had followed all the rules, then that would have hurt the client's case and put Chambers in a compromising position because now he knows that the lawyer says he followed the rules and informed his client about everything, and if a court asked Chambers if he had contacted the former lawyer and what did the lawyer say, Chambers would be under a legal obligation to inform the court exactly what the lawyer said, even if it hurt his client. That's why Chambers more than likely didn't talk with the former lawyer or ask any questions, because it would be doing a disservice to Bert's case unless Bert had already told him that the lawyer was going to say things favorable to Bert's case. Bert is a good example of why people without legal experience shouldn't comment about things they know nothing about, or attempt to be their own counsel.